On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:44 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Do we need both? We have neither in Debian (testing/sid) it seems > anyway.
Personally I'd say no, but this is for a ppa/unstable so it probably has different considerations. At the same time, this is a request from upstream. Ubuntu Lucid still has 0.22 and I've packaged my testing ppa with 0.39 to provide that. > Usualy an libopensync1-dev means the libopensync0-dev has become > obsolete and libopensync0 gets phased out as packages adapt to the new > one. Yes, they don't install because they both claim libopensync.so, the newer unstable one probably shouldn't. All other files don't seem to overlap. > If both are needed then their packagin needs to change to allow both > -dev packages to be installed in parallel. Thoughts on how to do this? Thanks for your answers so far. Martin, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1284562571.28250.24.ca...@delen
