Hi, I would be more then happy if emerald and emerald-themes go to unstable rather then experimental. I uploaded to mentors.debian.net new packages with unstable in the changelog.
Thanks again for your time and interest for helping me. :) Best, Janos On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 08:23:01PM +0200, Janos Guljas wrote: >> > I reviewed it, and it appears to work just fine. >> >> Thank you for a review. > > Note that I'm not a DD and cannot upload this for you. > > So sponsors, do you hear me? Please handle this fine gentelman. > >> > The only big issue I noticed is that the package is targetted at >> > experimental instead of unstable -- is there any reason for that? >> >> Experimental is targeted because of the freeze and this will be in >> new. If you think that unstable is acceptable, I'm glad to change? > > The only reason to avoid uploading release-quality packages to unstable is > to get some more testing for bugfixes to testing since more people run > unstable than testing+t-p-u. For a new package, that's totally irrelevant, > and it would force you to do a separate upload later. > > If you could upload it yourself, that would waste "just" buildd resources, > and since you can't, you'd have to bother a sponsor again. Unless there's > some other reason I don't know about, I'd go straight to unstable. > > > Meow! > -- > 1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor: > // Never attribute to stupidity what can be > // adequately explained by malice. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100925101201.ga31...@angband.pl > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikosxk+cmpjq79jhwec7u2xs=ahn3qjztlz6...@mail.gmail.com