Hi again, > > > >[...] (several previous reviews, you might want to acknowledge them in your > >changelog) > do you mean thanking guys in this thread helped me to fix the > package ? And put a line in debian/changelog ? But if so, I should > also open a bug ? >
No, that's not necessary - basically you can put in the changelog whatever you think is useful information, as long as you format it properly. There is absolutely no need for each and every line to include a "closes:..." entry. [...] > > >- debian/copyright: To the best of my knowledge, a simple<GPL3> is not > > acceptable. The optimal solution would be to even go for a DEP-5 formatted > > copyright file, see http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ > >- debian/docs: lists README.txt twice > >- debian/rules: A debian/install (and maybe debian/dirs) should help to > >simplify > > your rules, I think. > I think I have to dig into this. Could the package be acceptable > without this ? > Apart from the debian/docs thing: yes, sure, that's just nice-to-have ideas. > >- A number of source files lack copyright- and license-information. As you > >are > > upstream, this should be fairly easy to fix. > > But this one is a stringent requirement. Sorry for the delayed reply! Best regards, Michael
pgpG5GvK4M0D1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
