On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:39:58PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:35:07PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 19:12, Nanakos Chrysostomos > > <nana...@wired-net.gr> wrote:
> > > Another DD has told me in the past that I had to split my patches in > > > order for him > > > to accept my package and I should always work in that way for my packages > > > to be accepted. > > > > Well, I don't know if it was just a matter of personal taste of that > > DD, but it's not a requirement. You should provide a single patch for > > a single change, but it's not restricting the patch to touch only one > > file. So, in the example of -K, if the addition of it modifies 5 > > files, it's perfectly fine (and it is *the* standard way) to provide a > > single patch with all the diffs in it. > > I had the same perception as you on the issue but as I said before I had been > told > to follow these instructions. Anyway, your help from now on is precious > because I can > handle in a much better way future patches and versions of my packages. Just in case this has been me, I hope I wrote something about one patch per *issue* you try to fix and not one patch per changed file. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110420180616.GD16713@marvin