* Peter Pentchev [110426 15:49 +0300]: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2 > > of my package "ripit". > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper > > > > This is an upload to unstable with no changes to the version which resides > > in > > exparimental. > > I see that your package has already been uploaded; however, what do you > think about the attached couple of patches - a couple of minor improvements > and a couple of fixes to minor issues in the Debian packaging? None of them > are mandatory or anything; they're just things that I would do to my own > Debian packages, and of course it's up to you whether to accept them or not :)
Well, those patches are not structured well. Come in come out. Why not one patch per each file? Would be more comfortable to read. And why do you prefer "dh $@"? I'll pick up some hints but not all. Thanks Elimar -- The path to source is always uphill! -unknown- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426151807.gb3...@samweis.home.lxtec.de