-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kilian,
On 09.06.2011 09:28, Kilian Krause wrote: > the package name should be in sync with SONAME - no matter what ugly or > nice that makes the (binary) package name. ... > That being said, as Alexey is the upstream himself he can surely decide > what's the most suitable SONAME ... this is exactly what I meant. I think I pointed out, the package name is correct by the constraints the policy requires. I guess I could have been clearer though, so thank you for clarification. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN8HdaAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtv24P/2/q/WVE8nhHeJAuQZ0psiKS FdRktj7M4iIDQg0q+t97G8kMXergWji3WwUTfTo47RV1dN9h7bQrYtUerF8f126L lpozWI9OJq2wCJpuioBIIVXm3xOmcq+5WqtoqtAeIpHAadF1ACOzq16D267/YWER 2hzhm0Wr7UYFw2XZDdJdyp7OZWpjpEIRcJQQtX/U8GrbTQUSqOuHACxhbnKsVPoH uy4CWJKCe0BZQzCCDZgEmv/E4ihmR9XO3oasTNj/mWlwY6O+cX97OwAla+Sfenfi UA9gYJGQ6T7zx0FcaOYoAuZc4AqezbvgCl3Kw1JXAeCGM5WnHyhINJ+PMYqnf3Aj +24hmoTFi1k1S30vxJ9KjJTxWigT/DKMsbqkBnhOh1DJfR0h7I8F4fH90e7NDhaO URx5nYJ17hX+Vl9U+0EXyfXcaqaWm5HjPkTa84CUj1DvcyTNkcqZmn3lwX9DZmud 6H0jj+Ko/2owyivH+TvU66d4x+BIgJiCnr3HCUOUdDXMBbSqPyj9lbVY7qqMmMVI bDmk4S3NfY9A4tp6S1yKt9MQ2mCzecc6oFhGsR9ehYvOi3hdHwJd3riMWpOdWoFO uQD8yVcM8hJhkfvADcE2UzTSxj6T6Le+1Tvpf0/cwIMKtDmENjDL82ZKhuVlYFKP N5XOecU7GrfnORzjij3q =9DMz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4df0775a.7070...@toell.net