Le Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:28:26PM +0200, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > Kilian Krause wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > > Nicolas wrote: > > > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same. > > > > > > Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License > > > paragraph. > > > > actually you may be interested in the base-files package having > > /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-3 > > which would make a reference to that file sufficient IMHO. > > I was referring to the Apache and Expat licenses, that do not have a > stand-alone License section at all, in violation of DEP-5. You're > absolutely right about referring to the common-licenses files instead of > including the full text of the license, but a stand-alone License > paragraph is still required in that case.
Hello everybody, By the way, there is an excellent DEP 5 parser and validator packaged in Debian. I recommend to read the following article. http://ddumont.wordpress.com/2011/01/13/debian-copyright-dep5-parsereditorvalidatormigrator-is-released/ Have a nice Sunday, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110703022915.gc3...@merveille.plessy.net
