On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> wrote: > It is rare to see an RFS that says "The package appears to be lintian > clean." and the package (especially binary ones) actually be lintian > clean. If we were to change the RFS template, what could we change it > to in order to encourage accuracy and for people to actually use > lintian and fix any issues found.
INADD, but: We do have part of the upload on m.d.n, I have a hunch it'd be fairly simple to actually run Lintian on it, and report the status of the package. The trouble is that the uploads may or may not have the binary package, so it would have to be a bit "smart" about what it's actually checking. > > -- > bye, > pabs > > http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/caktje6ffj4eaadku34bkzj5fq57tw-dhudpevv6-gzv+xkj...@mail.gmail.com > > I'm a big +1 on this, I hate seeing "lintian clean" packages report a litany of issues :) Cheers, Paul -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAO6P2QTXW84zOJNwQoQsvKoVZq+bOFG=xe-djmjy_r51y5k...@mail.gmail.com
