On 2011-08-14 07:37, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > That seems like a very bad design decision for a site dedicate to the > iterative process of review then. I've always been told (and it has > been repeatedly mentioned on this very list) that packages should only > bump their version numbers for versions that actually entered the > official archives.
For the record, there are sponsors who prefer different review versioning process. This also was discussed some time ago on this list. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110814115108.GA28637@r500-debian
