On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin <manutm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i-news". > > This package was previously named 'News' and had issues. > > It's now lintian clean when building source and binary, although I found > lintian warning reported at http://mentors.debian.net/package/i-news > after uploading. > > * Package name : i-news > Version : 0.5.3-1 > Upstream Author : Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin > * URL : http://newsrssticker.com/unstable-debian/ > * License : GPL > Section : net > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/i-news > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/i-news/i-news_0.5.3-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards, > > -- > Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin <manutm...@gmail.com> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e51c92a.1000...@gmail.com > >
Excellent, looks like you fixed most of the issues found in your last RFS. There are a few more suggestions I'd like to make, though (some of these are purely pedantic, however). - debian/source/format should be updated to "3.0 (quilt)", not 1.0. - The remaining lintian warning is generated due to the fact that your Standards version is out-of-date; it's currently 3.9.2 (so check the upgrade checklist, and bump it up in debian/control). Also check to see if you're using the latest version of lintian, and if not, please update it. - Why priority "extra"? I'd suggest "optional". - I'd recommend updating debian/copyright to DEP-5 format [1]. Not strictly necessary, but seeing as DEP-5 is being more widely adopted nowadays... - There shouldn't be a "debian/copyright" entry in debian/docs. Please remove it. - I'd remove the boilerplate comments in debian/rules. Also, isn't "common-install-indep::" a cdbs thing? I don't think that has any effect in a dh style debian/rules, but I may be wrong about that. Kind regards, - Vincent Cheng [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACZd_tCHXDV65aNvTkD1Hx1gp8DKgD=u749gihuw+-oscuc...@mail.gmail.com