-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew,
On 08.09.2011 22:54, Andrew O. Shadura wrote: > We already have ITP bugs. Why not just retitle them into RFS when > someone wants their package to be sponsored? We discussed that in IRC a few days ago, where I was proposing that more or less. I summarize concerns to use WNPP: * The owner of the bug should be the person whom closes it. For WNPP bugs that's the maintainer, whereas for RFS bugs the owner. (jwilk) * Having sponsorship requests and tracking orphaned packages are different areas. (ansgar/jwilk) * WNPP bugs are about keeping track of package status. Not about mentoring (ansgar) That seem to be valid points, I admit. Above statements quoted without explicit permission - I hope that's ok. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOaS6uAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtATUQAMwC8BI8dikMPNn6DTcTtdGk exQhXYe9LbvZmOpmmKTKZ32IR8h4f1AR4/7mPWGZR6SSOvNU6vjwZOSQuu6DN1Jg TnL5UwQHlour4WLdQENJuxk5WPtmyUWrM25q4RPSwIbbfh74G8hSPIjvrvGegeLV YpIzVnD+WLAU6Ml68Jqg3D/Ng/3Ff5Nv2gQj5tSnB+2Cz06oRXNA/0q6aVmj5Iaf 19fmkdL6ZXSngepxOCX45rIiGgW9ITA9EygV/DnUZfPgufoNxsIln1TJ0zoNJXMA AlXxXXtCtjxUJXjircB2VO5osUvMF9H1vBSJagBhWjvrd09i7eJ62fDgS6jdpovw yeqzVJ0CEOPZZVmsd1QBW1qIibaRblUAyV2JZ5IwhlcM099F90m5DwC3HN6YhBq6 8tI2exS8DFdAUfF80a1zJift+P5INT8u4cdVOLag7ajrEDaok5CJRKY1vpwAUUZN AW486YnCUyAcZM1iysPoBq9RL5xSFHaRoU2fF0ygTjVkSd6vxM4V9b6z3LWH6TdR NomGKlyvyfZ2LADmeKWRa1rWFgke5CxvDt+ujYB4WsGI6n21lFNgnMvD4q2oMBkf vZsPLD8IgOUfbwgYO9ogPiHvvsnK7yme0N9bR6eo2QkeZw/c3u1FCWVArh2a6jCJ I/GqB3BzPPwSvSb7t1qz =0gn2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e692eae.8070...@toell.net