On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:14:11AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:46:26PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a question about an inline constructor and debian/symbols.
> > The code looks like this:
> >
> > class X {
> >
> > public:
> > X() { some code };
> > }
> >
> > According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html, this means
> > that the constructor is inlined.
>
> Good question.
Thanks :)
> IIRC inline is only a hint--it's not guaranteed to
> be inlined if the compiler thinks it's more efficient not to.
That is exactly my problem. A newer compiler version might change the
decision of the former version due to better optimization; but then I
see no way to guarantee stable symbols in the library.
> From the symbols POV, what really matters is the content of the ELF
> symbol table. If it's present then include it, otherwise don't.
It's present on some architectures, but not on others. I would like to
keep the symbols files for the different architectures as much as
possible in sync, that's why I'm asking.
Thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120106223349.GA8251@atlan
