Jon And why is your rfs "important" there are no critical or security related updates. ?
In your changelog you evan say urgency=low Just my 2 cents -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Jonathan McCrohan [mailto:jmccro...@gmail.com] Verzonden: zaterdag 2 juni 2012 2:55 Aan: 673...@bugs.debian.org CC: ba...@debian.org; clavi...@debian.org; ans...@debian.org Onderwerp: Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.5-1 [RC] Hi all, I've packaged figlet 2.2.5-1 [1] and uploaded it to mentors.d.n [2]. Thanks, Jon [1] figlet (2.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (closes: #674844) (closes: #617422) (closes: #150174) - figlet has been relicensed as BSD. All undistributable files have either been relicenced, or replaced with properly licenced alternatives; figlet can re-enter the archive, and can move back to main from non-free. \o/ - Drop 2.2.2-1 patches, applied upstream - New upstream makefile does not support setting variables from debian/rules; Added makefile_set_debian_{buildflags,paths}.patch accordingly. * Improve packaging - Update S-V to 3.9.3 - Bump Debhelper to v9 - Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format - Switch to dh-style debian/rules (closes: #672320) - Various lintian fixes - Update package description (closes: #557254) - Update debian/copyright (closes: #436302) - Fix moolets bashism (closes: #530082) - Move figlet manpage to alternatives system (closes: #403665) - Add watchfile - Add Homepage to debian/control - Remove references to deprecated figfonts(-cjk) packages - Remove local copies of man pages (merged upstream) * Add myself as co-maintainer -- Jonathan McCrohan <jmccro...@gmail.com> Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:35:22 +0100 [2] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/figlet/figlet_2.2.5-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/B1AA70CF260D6446B5DBB7B8C7E4CED501C2CEA2@srv03.dikkenberg.local
