Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Paul Wise wrote: >> Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? > > Isn't that completely contrary to that tag's usual meaning? > > You set it for stuff that should be in wheezy despite the bug. > > What we'd want here, is some way to convey "do not waste your time messing > with this bug if you care only about the next stable release". This > includes unstable-only packages like gcc-snapshot. >
Hi, We could agree on a usertag then, for instance: User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org Usertags: not-for-wheezy Using sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org as the User, we should be able to rearrange the default view of bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-requests to have the "for-wheezy" bugs on top (subclassified by severity) followed by the not-for-wheezy bugs. cf. http://wiki.debian.org/bugs.debian.org/usertags Regards, Thibaut. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff28f24.8010...@free.fr
