On 09/05/2012 03:14 PM, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > On 5 September 2012 14:55, Florian Schlichting > <fschl...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> Have you considered keeping branch names as they are, and setting >> git-debian-branch (and git-upstream-branch) in debian/gbp.conf / >> .gbp.conf? >> > Yes, but master will never be used again so I'd rather not leave it > around. Also then the alternate branch becomes the main master, so is > a bit confusing. >
I never understood why everyone insist in using the default name "master". This doesn't express anything at all. Instead, you should be using: - wheezy - sid - experimental then use a debian/gbp.conf as suggested by Florian, and have no branch named master *at all*. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/504703b5.2010...@debian.org
