On Friday 02 November 2012 17:58:08 you wrote: > (...) > Again, determining the "right" solution would be best to discuss on > the redhat bug or preferably with upstream.
Ok. I did post that on redhat bugzilla. upstream did not publish anything for years... > Until those things happen, I am going to suggest that we as potential > sponsors wait for a "right" solution to work out. Oh? This will take a while then. I'm not sure it's smart to use the redhat patch, but it is safe. And we need to be safe. Some DD needs to apply the 2 nd patch of redhat [1] "80-width patch" if we want this RC fixed soon. The first patch does not work. I don't see the point to upload a version of just that to mentors. Just use: patch -p 1 < 80-width patch , update the changelog and you're done with the NMU. Cheers [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-4527
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
