Dear mentors, Anton, I've recently updated my package "libaria"
* Package name : libaria Version : 2.7.5.2-3 Upstream Maintainer : Reed Hedges <reed.hed...@adept.com> * URL : http://robots.mobilerobots.com/wiki/ARIA * License : GPL-2 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libaria-demo - C++ library for MobileRobots/ActivMedia robots (demo example) libaria-dev - C++ library for MobileRobots/ActivMedia robots (devel) libaria-dev-doc - C++ library for MobileRobots/ActivMedia robots (devel docs) libaria2 - C++ library for MobileRobots/ActivMedia robots python-libaria - C++ library for MobileRobots/ActivMedia robots (Python bindings) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libaria Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/liba/libaria/libaria_2.7.5.2-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Removed statically linked library. * Corrected Multi-Arch config for the doc package. * Building python-libaria package (SWIG generated bindings) * Building libaria-demo package I've named the python package python-libaria, but the packaged module is named AriaPy. Debian Python Policy states that the package name should be the module name prefixed by python-, but on the other hand, package names should be lower case (Debian Policy). Compromise would be python-ariapy, but it seems redundant. Also, I've added only the default python version to Build-Depends. Hope this is OK. Furthermore, I've packaged an example binary using the library in a separate package (because of the Multi-Arch support). I've renamed it from demo to aria-demo. And last, libaria-dev-doc packages CPP examples for using the library. I've also provided a Makefile there, that builds those examples in /tmp (default). PS I've tried to build the package in squeeze environment (for backporting), and while it did succeed after adding backports repository (for debhelper, lintian, ...), python package wasn't correctly generated (uses dh_python2). Also, lintian complained about Hardening, which should be handled by the backported debhelper 9, right? Anyway, even if I do succeed in generating the package for squeeze, would it be of any good (since I've locally added backports to my squeeze environment). Best regards, Srećko Jurić-Kavelj, dipl.ing. (Ms.E.E) Research and Teaching Assistant at University of Zagreb (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Department of Control and Computer Engineering) Phone: +385 (0)1 6129 529 Fax: +385 (0)1 6129 809 E-mail: srecko.juric-kav...@fer.hr URL: http://www.fer.hr/srecko.juric-kavelj Sanctus Hieronymus: "Parce mihi, Domine, quia dalmata sum!" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caacrlc0bqanfghc0gp+-e6az_wf_75cwwuugejd-frtbu_t...@mail.gmail.com