On 2014-03-20 23:21, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Christian Kastner <deb...@kvr.at>, 2014-03-20, 22:49: >> This is problematic. First, you need to demangle the symbols in there >> with c++filt (for examples, your package FTBFS on my host without this). > > I haven't looked into details of this particular package, but in general > unmangling rarely helps curing FTBFS due to missing symbols. The C++ > mangling rules are (mostly?) architecture-idependent. What does vary > with architecture are how various types (size_t, intN_t, va_list, etc.) > are typedefed. But demangling doesn't help dealing with this variation. > > For example, symbol names for a f(size_t) function are: > _Z1fj on i386, > _Z1fm on amd64. > > After unmangling it becomes: > f(unsigned int) on i386, > f(unsigned long) on amd64.
Interesting. TBH, I glanced over the result and prematurely jumped to a conclusion, I guess. Time to take another look. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/532b6bad.4010...@kvr.at
