On 2014-06-09 01:10:40, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >Hard to say atm as I've compared python-fysom_1.0.15.orig.tar.gz > >produced by dpkg and upstream provided tarball for > >fysom-1.0.15.tar.gz and internally (files and dirs) looks the > >same. But it's interesting so I try to figure it out. > > Huh, orig.tar should be provided by the maintainer, not generated by > dpkg. I didn't even know that dpkg can do it.
My bad, bad wording, fysom-1.0.15.tar.gz is provided by upstream and python-fysom_1.0.15.orig.tar.gz created from git upstream branch where fysom-1.0.15.tar.gz has been imported from upstream tarball. > >Regarding X-Python-Version it's implemented as well, > > Why is it > X-Python-Version: >= 2.7 > > when upstream explicitly says 2.6 is supported? I just ignored oldstable (EOF is very soon) and everything from stable forwards is defaulting to 2.7 but as it's not a problem it can be changed. -- |_|0|_| | |_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" | |0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- | gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x58C338B3 3DF1 A4DF C732 4688 38BC F121 6869 30DD 58C3 38B3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140609064423.ga10...@bashton004.kulisz.net
