Hi, iyou dropped the ITP bug as a recipient - was that intended?
In case it was I only quoted the small part below. I hope that's okay? Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-25 16:01:36) > 2014-08-24 17:22 GMT-03:00 Johannes Schauer <j.scha...@email.de>: > > But vcmi itself is GPL-2+ and both resources agreed that Apache2 is > > compatible > > with GPL3. So could vcmi in Debian thus not be shipped as GPL3+ instead of > > GPL2+? > > I think that no. You can ask about this issue in mentors. However, I > think that this code is, currently, undistributable. I already had a > similar case and the upstream wrote a new code to drop an reused GPLed > code. The software is Yara. > > > I submitted the problem to the upstream bugtracker. > > > > http://bugs.vcmi.eu/view.php?id=1884 > > > Ok. I hope you get a solution. the upstream of fuzzylite relicensed from apache 2.0 to LGPL 3.0 with the release of fuzzylite 5.0 (but not the versions prior to that). So if upstream should upgrade their copy of the embedded fuzzylite, then the license problem should go away. cheers, josch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140829135205.3685.59631@hoothoot
