On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:46:53AM +0200, Vincent Prat wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > Thank you for the review. > >The latest version is 0.4. > Where have you found this? On both Pypi and Github, the latest release is > 0.2.2. wrar@belkar ~/tmp/astroquery-0.2.1 $ uscan --verbose --report -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: opts=filenamemangle=s/.+\/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz/astroquery-$1\.tar\.gz/,uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?((RC|rc|pre|dev|beta|alpha)\d*)$/$1~$2/ https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/tags .*/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz -- Found the following matching hrefs: /astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2.2.tar.gz (0.2.2) /astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2.1.tar.gz (0.2.1) /astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2.tar.gz (0.2) /astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.4.tar.gz (0.4) /astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2-rc2.tar.gz (0.2~rc2) /astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.2-rc.tar.gz (0.2~rc) /astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.1.tar.gz (0.1) Newest version on remote site is 0.4, local version is 0.2.1 => Newer version available from https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/archive/v0.4.tar.gz -- Scan finished
> >Also, I couldn't actually build the package because of missing > >python3?-astropy-helpers. > Version 0.2 needed astropy-helpers to build, so I asked the maintainer of > astropy to package astropy-helpers as well. > The package is now in the NEW queue. Well, I cannot (at least easily) build packages depending on packages in NEW (or on any packages not in the archive, for that matter). > However, it seems that astropy_helpers is now included in the astroquery > source tarball. > Maybe I should remove the dependencies and use the bundled version. What is > your opinion about this? If it's intended to be used as a public module you need to package it as such, it doesn't matter much whether it's a separate tarball. In any case, if it's already packaged as a separate source package you shouldn't use bundled versions too. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature