Thank you very much for the reply. Yes I think a link to something like this on the project's page would do it until then, great! I'll check for it and put in the copyright register in the package, then.
Greetings, Daniel On 14.06.2015 17:26, Rintze Zelle wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Bruce D'Arcus and I think that the MIT license might be the best > option for relicensing the CSL schema. I just proposed the change on > our mailing list > (http://xbiblio-devel.2463403.n2.nabble.com/MIT-license-as-default-for-CSL-software-tp7579193p7579395.html), > but I don't expect any objections. We certainly always wish to be > FOSS-compatible and nonrestrictive. > > If nobody objects to the MIT license, it might still be a while before > I get to updating all the schema files with the new license, so maybe > I'll just make a note to that effect on http://citationstyles.org/. > You can also rely on this email for permission to package the schema > under MIT-license terms. > > Best, > > Rintze -- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/557d9eb5.7010...@danielstender.com
