Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2015, 06:28 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:26:52PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > > > > My guess it that the only fix needed here is to rebuild Boost > > > > against the > > > > new C++ ABI (i.e. with GCC 5). :/ > > > > > > Is this a reason to re-assign this bug to Boost? > > > > It's already reported as #790351 ;-) > > So I'm tempted to close this bug since I do not see a good reason > to stop the propagation of the latest version to testing which has > closed the original bug. > > Would you agree about this?
For solarpowerlog I did just downgrade it to important, but I had to fix boost.m4 for gcc5, which only solves a part of the FTBFS. The others are caused by the ABI breakage in the libs (boost and two others) IMHO if mira needs no fix its your side, there's no bug. IMHO as long as pGCC-5 is not the default this shouldn't be RC, especially as it is at the moment mostly the new C++11 ABI stuff that breaks things everyhere, especially libraries. At least if looks like from my perspective. But just my 2c... -- tobi > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1436420800.412.7.ca...@debian.org
