On 9 September 2015 at 04:42, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:36:00PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: >> 2. or provide two source packages, of which main would build only >> CPU implementation while in non-free would build both/only GPU >> (depending how organized). > > Yeah, that's not super great. I might consider a -src > package and build-depend on that. That's a monumental hack, though, and > I don't like seeing that in the archive.
What is wrong with doing it that way? Working with nvidia-cuda-toolkit, I've come across the following packages: https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/starpu.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/starpu-contrib.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hwloc.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hwloc-contrib.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eztrace.html https://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eztrace-contrib.html