On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 20:50 +0000, Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:45 AM Sam Morris <s...@robots.org.uk> wrote: > > I think this happens because you have vim 2:7.4.488-7 (from jessie) > > installed, which uses libruby2.1. vim in testing/unstable uses > > libruby2.2, so upgrading to this version would get things working. > > It would, but the packaging system should ensure that whatever > version of vim is installed, the program will work or won't be > installable. > > > > In fact, I'll probably just remove the version requirements on > > those > > build-dependencies entirely--they just get in the way when > > backporting > > the package to run on jessie. > Are you sure? Isn't this a linking problem? > > To me the plugin is linked to ruby 2.2 and vim linked to ruby 2.1 > It sort of needs a dpkg-shlibdeps type of thing going on, but with > vim not ldd.
Indeed, right now there doesn't appear to be a way to say "I depend on vim-ruby provided by a package that itself depends on libruby2.2". -- Sam Morris <https://robots.org.uk/> CAAA AA1A CA69 A83A 892B 1855 D20B 4202 5CDA 27B9
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part