Hello, On 2015-12-29 13:45 CET, Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> wrote:
> As I said, the followings are not blocker, but unless you have a (good) > reason for not doing them, I'd prefer to see them fixed/changed. > > * please use short format dh done > * add a Vcs-Browser field done > * please bump d/compat to 9 done > * I'm pretty sure the *.dirs are mostly useless removed > * I know nothing of lips, and less about the packaging of lips stuff, but > isn't there a dh tool to autocreate the postinst snippet? I tried dh_lisp but it doesn't seem to generate the postinst scripts. I left the postinst script and will post on the pkg-common-lisp-devel ML to find out more befor the next release. > * from check-all-the-things: > + can you explain these? > - Warning in 'control binary:"cl-asdf" Recommends:1' value 'sbcl | > lisp-compiler': package lisp-compiler is unknown. Check for typos if not a > virtual package. lisp-compiler is a virtual package: https://packages.debian.org/sid/lisp-compiler > - Warning in 'control binary:"cl-asdf" Breaks:0' value 'sbcl-common (<= > 1:0.9.13.0-2)': package sbcl-common is unknown. Check for typos if not a > virtual package. > - Warning in 'control binary:"cl-asdf" Replaces:0' value 'sbcl-common (<= > 1:0.9.13.0-2)': package sbcl-common is unknown. Check for typos if not a > virtual package. removed references to old package sbcl-common > + please fix the first and fix upstream the others: > - $ codespell --quiet-level=3 > ./debian/changelog:1247: Seperate ==> Separate done > ./test/ecl-make-image/readme.lisp:62: doesnt ==> doesn't > ./doc/asdf.texinfo:2992: throughly ==> thoroughly will submit a patch upstream Thanks Kambiz
