On Thursday 17 December 2015 15:51:51 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place. > > > I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source > > > code if it is possible to compile and use it without patching. > > > > > > Using patches has problem for inconsistency and upgrading if original > > > source code which patch modify changes. > > > > > > And also I see using patches as last option. Are not Debian want to > > > reduce patches if they are not really needed? > > > > I think it's appropriate to apply a patch (and submit it upstream) in > > this case, as this is certainly a bug in the upstream makefile, and it > > should be fixed. > > Ok. I can send patch to upstream project which fix compilation (on > debian). But, what is wrong with my original (and current) version which > use pmake and does not need patching original software?
So what is current state? I would like to know what is wrong with my approach and if is really wrong... -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
