On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > [2016-03-01 13:28] Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@debian.org> > > please DON'T CC debian-mentors (or anybody, for what metters) while > > filing bugs to sub...@bugs.debian.org. The CCed people will receive an > > email from you without the bug number, and will be unable to follow-up > > correctly. In this particular case you also risked a double email, > > since debian-mentors receive bugs against sponsorship-request. > > And you mistyped the pseudo-package name, missing the trailing s. > > Sorry about it.
I forgot to add: in the case you need to make somebody aware of the bug
report you're filing, you should use X-Debbugs-CC (either as a real or
pseudo header). Then debbugs will send the bug report to that address
after having assigned the bug number, and adding the bug address to the
recipients.
And BTW, dunno how, you did mail d-mentors without keeping 816363@b.d.o
in CC, so the bug did not contain your message. I bounced your email,
and "fixed" the recipients.
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:51:51AM -0500, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> So it would be okay to have NMU with several lintian errors and heap of
> warnings?
Usually for a NMU that's ok. Maybe you can consider fixing the most
important errors, but in a NMU you refrain from doing too many changes
(unless ACKed by the maintainer, or in some special situations).
> > Though that package is actually unmaintained, and don't see an upload
> > since 9+ years.
> > Considering that pape is MIA but tends to (slowly) reply to mails [0],
> > please try to contact him (better as a follow-up of this RFS) and see
> > what he has to say.
>
> Before starting to work I tried to contact him. No reply since 8th
> Feb. Would it be polite to take maintainership?
maybe pape is willing to either orphan or anyway givign up on the
maintainship.
since Feb 8th only 3 weeks are passed, in Debian that's not considered
too much to wait, at all. If you look at the email I linked before
you'll noticed he replied after more than that.
If pape gives up the package I'll be only happy to see another package
being updated to the newer standards :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
