> I don't know enough about the python-qtawesome package to tell whether > python-xstatic-font-awesome is equivalent functionality-wise.
Me too :) > I don't expect it to be an easy pitch to ask the Spyder team to > rethink their dependency chain just for the sake of re-usability. > Unless you had a different reason in mind? No thi si sjuste that I do not want duplication in the Debina archive. so maybe this qtaesome code is almost equivalent to the python-xstatic-font-aweosme. I need to investigate :) > Besides, what about the elusive fonts? I am on it And I think that it will be an easy task :) I already asked to become part of the pkg-fonts team today :) Cheers Fred > FYI, I have upgraded the packaging with the latest upstream version > (0.3.1). Shall I upload it to mentors? If you want :) Cheers Fred
