control: block 544012 by -1 control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:18:58PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mdk-doc-non-dfsg"; it is > > the non-DFSG documentation (GNU Free Documentation License with invariant > > front and back covers) for mdk, the MIX Development Kit. > > > > * Package name : mdk-doc-non-dfsg Is there a good reason to have such a name for the source package? What was wrong with just "mdk-doc" ? > > Note that I'm aware that Lintian produces a single pedantic message about > > the watch file checking the upstream PGP signature; well, the watch file > > actually does that, but it uses a line continuation syntax that Lintian > > does not yet understand; I intend to file a bug about that, hopefully along > > with a patch, soon. well, to fix that tag is enough to remove the whitespaces. Anyway, yes please file that bug. > > dget -x > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/m/mdk-doc-non-dfsg/mdk-doc-non-dfsg_1.2.9-1.dsc > > OK, I've uploaded a new version of mdk-doc-non-dfsg to mentors.d.n at > the same location with a single major change: declare compliancy with > Debian Policy 3.9.7 and, thus, install the documentation into > /usr/share/doc/mdk/ instead of /usr/share/doc/mdk-doc/ as suggested by > the brand new policy's section 12.3. cool. I find the package ok, apart from its name. I find no sense whatsoever to have '-non-dfsg' in the source package name, the section is enough. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature