Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One problem with this is that for non-free packages it is unclear if > it is even allowed to build them. Ofhand I know of one (pine) which
Right, I well understand why the autobuilders stick to main. > It would be nice to have a list of packages in contrib/non-free that > may legally be autobuild and that can be autobuild with free software > alone. Agreed, though buildd maintainers should of course still have the right to limit their machines to main. > I scheduled bsdgames-nonfree for build on magix (inofficial mipsel > buildd). Its currently building k3d and bsdgames-nonfree will be next. Thanks, though as I mentioned elsewhere in the thread, I'm more concerned about the existing outdated binaries for arm and mips than the lack of a mipsel binary, which may become out of date and hard to update down the road. > The amd64 wanna-build includes contrib/non-free ignoring the fact that > packages might not legally be build. Once amd64 enters sid that > probably changes unless the above mentioned whitelist can be made. Ah. ;-) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
