Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>As said, I would stick to the git-buildpackage standards, that means a > >>git branch for upstream sources, which can get imported with > >>git-import-orig > > LM> Sounds right! > > We would still be compliant with the git-buildpackage standards, but > we would simply have more branches than only master and upstream.
I did not (yet) have a look at git-buildpackage at all, so may I ask you to not stress that particular tool that much? I'd very much prefer on having the workflow propoerly explained. If git-buildpackage brings documentation for a sensible workflow (and it seems that the workflow is indeed sensible), then great! less work for us. > In any case if exporting patch branches does not sound good, I can > keep them in my private repository only, that's the beauty of git :) I think we should avoid that, at least for now. FWIW, I haven't found the "beauty" of git yet... :/ -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
