Hi, On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:30:49PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > I don't think so. I think metapackages should relate to tasks, not > suites. That means that each non application should go in the relevant > task rather than create a non metapackage.
I'm not fully sure whether I understand what you are talking about but may be the following hint is helpful to you: If you might like to set Metapackage: false inside the tasks file there will be no metapackages generated but the task will be rendered on the web sentinel. > > Note, some packages are not in Debian yet! But I think they're important for > > the future of linuxaudio in Debian: > > > > - Ardour3 > > - non-mixer http://non.tuxfamily.org/ > > - non-timeline > > - non-session-manager > > - non-sequencer > > - carla http://kxstudio.sourceforge.net/KXStudio:Applications:Carla > > - calfbox (free alternative for linuxsampler SFZ sampler, > > http://repo.or.cz/w/calfbox.git) > > - lisaloqt (frontend for calfbox) > > Well, they are not in debian because they have not been packaged yet > (except for ardour3 I think). Lets hope we can bring in more > developers to package all these interesting applications! If there are any inofficial packages around you might like to steal the packaging stuff and just commit it to the repository. Once they are in VCS and mentioned inside the tasks file a paragraph in the prospective packages section of the web sentinel will be created. This can be helpful to attract potential packagers. (Feel free to ask for more details if something might remain unclear.) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130527114241.gb15...@an3as.eu
