Hi,
On 20.11.2014 21:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2014-11-20 17:09:49)
On 19.11.2014 13:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Possibly we can simplify even further:
* Have package libavcodec-extra-NN provide virtual libavcodec-extra
(i.e. non-versioned name of itself)
* Let GPLv2 packages conflict against libavcodec-extra (i.e. not
replace but complement existing suggests/recommends/depends).
How does that sound?
This sounds good, except that the virtual package needs another name,
because libavcodec-extra is actually a real package [1].
I don't see a problem in conflicting both with virtual provisions of the
package and the real package - as the latter seems to me to provide
nothing beyond pulling in latest of those same virtual provisions.
Indeed, that's no problem.
Best regards,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546e4d0e.8020...@googlemail.com
