On Monday 04 December 2000 00:13, Neal H Walfield wrote: > I help develop and help maintain the Hurd. As > such, it is important to me the direction it takes. What is also > important to me is having a voice in the Debian project (of which the > Hurd is a part -- at least the front page of Debian makes that claim). > Sure, I can post to mailing lists and make my opinion known, however, I > cannot vote. Thus, what happens when there is a vote about the Hurd (or > in general). Will other developers working and maintaining the Hurd not > have a voice? Or what if I wish to call a vote? Or propose an amendment?
Yes. You right at this point and this is a problem. But what would be happen if tenths of new maintaners, accepted by theirs good intensions only, decide to vote for something wrong about the GNU Debian/Hurd project and against you, only from this reason they never did any package which works also under the Hurd? Which situation is better for you? Mariusz -- Mariusz Przygodzki | Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771 GPG Fingerprint: 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771
