On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 01:52:56AM +0100, James Troup wrote: > Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How about a "Code of conduct" for the DAM. > > haha. not. How about you stop trolling? > > You know, every time people post idiocies like this, it simply > detracts from the time I could be spending on processing applicants. > That's not a threat or anything like that, just a fact. It's very > disappointing to see posts like this but have my calls for help[1] (on > the same list) ignored. :-(
Are you honestly attempting to claim that the minute or so it takes to write emails like this, significantly detracts from your workload? Me, I'm still waiting to know why I was left waiting for 2 months. Seriously, to just write a short (even 3 sentence) explanation for the people when they passed, say, a month ... that would *not* take long. Unless, of course, you have so much work that you have that little time to dedicate to Debian; in which case you probably should be better spending your time, maybe step aside and hand it (DAM) to someone else trusted. IMHO. (BTW, I have read the archives, and I dare say that there are more than a couple of very trusted people who could do it). What I want to know, is why do some people get through in 2 days (like some I know), and why some are left hanging after more than 4 months (like some I know). If, like you say, you are actively working on the 4-month people, how come all these 2-day people get through, in 2 days? -d, who does not see the logic in this argument at all, except for the "I like him, but not him, so I'll just ignore him until he goes away" argument -- Daniel Stone (apparently not a) Linux Kernel Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 G!>CS d s++:- a---- C++ ULS++++$>B P---- L+++>++++ E+(joe)>+++ W++ N->++ !o K? w++(--) O---- M- V-- PS+++ PE- Y PGP>++ t--- 5-- X- R- tv-(!) b+++ DI+++ D+ G e->++ h!(+) r+(%) y? UF++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
