* Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-25 01:11]: > 5. At http://people.debian.org/~joerg/bad.licenses.tar.bz2 you can > - find a tarball of 4 bad licenses. Compare these licenses with the > - first nine points of the DFSG and show what changes they need to > + find a tarball of 4 bad licenses. Please compare these licenses with the > + first nine points of the DFSG and show what changes would be needed to
ok. > make them DFSG-free. No need to compare word for word, for some > - licenses this is an impossible task, but you should spot the > + licenses this is an impossible task: just limit yourself in spotting the > biggest mistakes. Left out since it's probably a matter of taste. This sentence is really not nice, though, so I might change it alltogether. > 5a. The GNU Free Documentaion License (FDL) has been heavily discussed > - on debian-legal recently. Read > + on debian-legal recently. Please read ok > http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html and > - briefly explain how you feel about the including documents > - licensed under the FDL in main and what consequences of this > - position might be for Debian. > + briefly explain how you feel about including documents ok. > + licensed under the FDL in main and what might be the consequences of this > + position for Debian. No, that's wrong. Only s/consequences/the consequences/. > 6. Are there any sections of the DFSG or Social Contract that you > - might like to see changed? If so, why? > + might like to see changed? If so, which ones, and why? ok > + 7. What is your current agenda with regards to Debian, and how does it > + fit with the Social Contract? This is usually asked in the welcome message. > - 8. Tell me 3 different methods to close a bug in the BTS, the difference > + 8. Please tell me 3 different methods to close a bug in the BTS, the > difference ok > -15. How do you check a package before upload? Please explain to me why > +15. How do you check a package before the upload? Please explain why Maybe "before you upload". > -24. Should you happily sign another developer's GPG key? If not > - please, explain me the checks you will make before signing it. > +24. Should you happily sign another developer's GPG key? If not, > + please explain me the checks you will make before signing it. OK, and s/me//. > These two lists are must-subscribes. Everything else is optional. I > -abbreviate 'debian-' to '-' from now on! > +abbreviate 'debian-' to '-' from now on. ok > -security-announce: > security updates to stable > -private: you'll be subscribed automatically when your new-maintainer > - application is accepted; sensitive discussions, flamewars > - etc. You can unsubscribe if you wish. > + application is accepted; sensitive discussions. You can I changed this a bit. > -mentors: helping newbie Developers. > +TODO: -vote? > +TODO: -project? -project: project related discussions > -Finally talk about some important websites: > +Finally, some important web links: ok Thanks. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
