On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 02:40:37PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > So, your recommendation is to implement a parallel NM process to the > existing one and prove that it is better? I doubt that it would make *any* > sense when the DAMs won't accept the outcome of that process and this is > *very* unlikely. :) >
Have you actually asked them, with a clear proposal on how things will work? I can't see the DAMs blocking something for the sake of it. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
