On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:40:35AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On 11/26/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:25:10PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > > I'd like to advocate Martin-'Eric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for DM. > > > He is already under NM, T&S stage > > > (https://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=q-funk%40iki.fi). > > [...] > > > I believe his knowledge about packaging is well enough as Debian > > > maintainer > > Can you tell me if you have reason to believe his knowledge of packaging has > > improved since the time at which bugs #384364 and #409356 were filed? > Steve, turning previous disagreements over those bugs into excuses is > not gonna do. This is not about "disagreements", these are examples of serious mistakes you've made. We all make mistakes, what I want to know is whether you've learned from yours. A person who introduces a root hole in a package by setting a binary setuid root without any peer review (including from upstream) should not be allowed archive upload access. A person who ignores pointers to failed build logs when they are handed to him and insists instead that his package has no release-critical bugs should not be allowed archive upload access. Are you still that person? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
