On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:22:22 pm Iustin Pop wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:04:21PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote: > > Hi Iustin > > > > > During all my NM process, I felt like I can very much influence the > > > process - answer faster, answer better and I progress. So it was much > > > better than I feared, based on urban legends. > > > > > > However, I'm now "Waiting for DAM" for a couple of weeks and I wonder > > > what happens now. Is it just waiting for someone to have time to do > > > this processing? Or is it there something more (like a hidden patience > > > test :)? > > > > > > I know that some people waited for many months at this stage, so I > > > shouldn't complain… In any case, > > > http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step7 only says that there is a > > > completeness check of the report, and thus I'm confused. > > > > Heh, you can't write this email after waiting in the DAM queue for 2 > > weeks ... you should be rejected for this. :P > > He he :) > > > Nah seriously, just wait a little longer. I actually don't thing it's > > such a bad idea that people wait a little to show that they really show > > interest and that it's not a temporary thing (nothing to do with you). > > That makes sense, but in all fairness, then it should be advertised as > such - e.g. something like "the last stage is to observe your behaviour > in interaction with other maintainers and users, etc. for X months". Please note that this is just my personal opinion and not (necessarily) the intention behind the queue.
> Again, I don't mind waiting (for most of my packages I'm > DM-Upload-Allowed, so no blocking point), I was just wondering if > everything is OK or whether I need to complete some secret objectives I > don't know of. Of course, if they are really secret you can't tell me > anyway :) Nah, no secret, we only have secret cabals but no secret inauguration rites. :) Cheers Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
