On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:03:29AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Friday 10 September 2004 09:56 am, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 03:18:21PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Can I just do: > > > > > > svn rm mod-caml_1.1.9+cvs.2004.07.30.orig.tar.gz > > > svn add <<name of new package>> > > > > > > and commit that? Or should I be doing other things? > > > > Sure, that works well. > > [periodic svn rant] > > Argh, this is all so complex and wrong. Why not use Arch and > tla-buildpackage?
Because tla is horrendous and uncomprehensible :) > tla-importdsc foo.dsc > tla-buildpackage -rfakeroot > tla-markdeb > > Very simple. One should never have to put a tarball in the repository > IMHO. It's a lot harder to merge :-) Well, what guarantee do you have that the tarball will always be available ? If nothing else it should always go with the tagged versions, but then, arch doesn't support proper tagging anyway. > Arch makes it a lot easier to have a "distributed" group of maintainers, > too. Yeah, but there is benefit for a centralized repo too. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
