On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 09:15:34PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 05:01:44PM +0100, Sven wrote: > > > > We also need someone to look at the mmm program, it would be nice to have it > > working again. i repackaged ocamltk for it, but failed to find the time to > > continue work on it (there was a bug in it, which i told upstream, (upstream > > bieng pierre and jun) but didn't have time to follow on it.) > > If I remember right (please correct me if I'm wrong, this is just from > memory) then mmm accepts only syntactically correct html. This alone > would make it unusable for any practical purposes, except as an html syntax > checker. Furthermore it implements only html version 2.2 fully, and most > of 3.2. I don't think that this is the kind of application that will > convince people of ocaml. > > And the licence does not allow binary distribution of derivative work, > which means that it is non-free anyway.
As said, the licence should be no problem, i have lost previous mails on the subject in a disk crash, but i seem to remember that this should be no problem. Friendly, Sven Luther
