Hi Sven and all others, Am 2003-04-11 12:27 +0200 schrieb Sven Luther: > > Another DD pointed me at the tool "chrpath" which is able to remove > > the RPATH in a library. Would you recommend using that? > > ... well, i don't think i would recomend it, since the ocaml situation > is a bit different from the C situation.
Claudio's recent mail seems to settle that issue. I'll forget about the rpath; I'm perfectly happy with this solution, I just wanted to settle that issue before offering a package with lintian bugs. > Mmm, i suppose you are building on i386 only and thus producing > native code executables, you are aware that this will break on all > the arches where the native code is not supported (m68k, hppa, s390, > mips, mipsel i think). I'm aware of that issue. My current approach is to build a bytecode package (arch: all) for the "general case" (this would binary-depend on ocaml-base) and a package offering native versions for all platforms supporting it. AFAIK there is a possibility to achieve that with package diversions. Up to now I do not know anything about that (I'm a beginner, after all), but I will RTFM and tinker until I'm enlightened :-) > > http://www.piware.de/Sources.gz > > Ok, i will look at it. Thanks! As I already said: only native compiling up to now, but that's going to change. > I will have to update it. BTW, you are using the sid ocaml packages, > right ? I admit that I'm still using the testing version up to now (due to my slow modem net connection). But if it seems advisable, I can apt-pin to the unstable one, of course. Thank you for your help! Martin -- Martin Pitt home: www.piware.de eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verteidigen Sie Ihre Freiheit und Ihre Rechte! Stoppt TCPA! Defend your freedom and your rights! Stop TCPA! http://www.notcpa.org
pgp1YTtSpE2zU.pgp
Description: PGP signature