Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:47:09AM -0400, Debian Installer wrote: >> There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the >> override file for the following file(s): >> >> liblablgtk2-ocaml_0.beta.20030423-2_i386.deb: package says section is libs, >> override says devel. >> >> Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think >> the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package >> so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the >> override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. > > Now, i am a bit baffled, i don't really know who is the human reading > this, but my understanding of the libdevel section stuff and such is > that : > > > o All libfoo-ocaml packages should go into the libs section. > They are runtime libraries needed to actually run the binaries > linked to them. > > o All libfoo-ocaml-dev packages should go into the libdevel section > (would be nice if the changelog vim syntax would know about them > also though). They are needed to build binaries, and as thus are > rightly placed in the development library section. > > o But what about the foo source package which contain these two ? > Should it also have a section, and if yes, which ?
They should go into libs. Moved. -- James
