On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:54:56AM -0800, David Fox wrote: > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > > >That said, i could make a ocaml-interpreter package, which would be > > >provided, replaced and conflicted by the ocaml package. What do you > > >think of that ? > > > > > > > > > > I was thinking that since the ocaml-interpreter is all files that are > > currently part of the ocaml package, you could make ocaml depend on > > ocaml-interpreter and make ocaml-interpreter depend on ocaml-base. > > Yep, i understand, but ocaml-interpreter is part of the ocaml package. > So either you get the true thing (ocaml) or only the interpreter.
But when you split the ocaml package as David suggested and put the interpreter in a separate package and remove it from the ocaml package. Why wouldn't that work? As we did before when creating the ocaml-base package? -Ralf. --
