On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:30:16AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > Maybe i am wrong but i think it is best to keep dh_ocaml out of > debhelper. I feel it should be better for made it evolve at will... > Maybe it can become a real package ?
I agree. I saw that a dh-lisp package (a "debhelper add-on" for Common Lisp) just entered the archive, so there's certainly precedent. The only downside I see is that OCaml packages that use it will have to build-depend on dh-ocaml in addition to debhelper. Are there other advantages or disadvantages? -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
