> The only choice which is not a good solution is "2)" since, it requires
> work that is quite complicated to do if upstream doesn't agree.
Well, not really (at least in theory).
You can just run the old camlp4 once to translate the source to standard
syntax and then package the translated sources. In principle this could
be done at every new upstream release. It could be bad debian practice,
though.
Cheers,
C.S.C.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Real name: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
Doctor in Computer Science, University of Bologna
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cs.unibo.it/~sacerdot
----------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
