On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:13:02AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:02:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Anyway, this is certainly no worse than what happened with the maintainer > > upload of ulex, which was uploaded before findlib was available on all archs > > and had to be given back after a FTBFS.
> Well, sorry, but I consider this as a shortcoming in our buildd > infrastructure and I'm not always willing to dilute my workflow because > of that. When I upload something like ulex I provide all the information > to discover that the build won't be possible. Why can't this be > automatically detected and need manual work? > I understand that this way I've cause additional work to someone else > and I'm sorry for that, but having to dilute work on a set of related > packages is sub-optimal for me. Maybe I can upload to delayed or > something next time, but I'm convinced something about that can be fixed > on the buildd side (but no, I'm not volunteering, I'm just replying to > your complain). Dude, I wasn't complaining, I was pointing out that the binNMUs I scheduled are no different than the maintainer uploads. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]