Stéphane Glondu <st...@glondu.net> writes: > There are of course many other checks that we (OCaml maintainers) would > like Lintian to perform. Attached are some of them.
> I am sending this right now to get some feedback from the Lintian > maintainers about the coding style, the structure of the code, etc. I've written a test suite for this that seems to work, although I suspect it will throw a bunch of other errors if we add more tests for other things in the OCaml Policy. I also tweaked the patch a bit, and it's now committed for the next release of Lintian. I did change the severity of one tag: I downgraded ocaml-stray-cmo from normal to minor on the grounds that the long tag description says that the file is just useless, not actually harmful, which makes it a minor bug instead of a normal bug. Let me know if that's not correct. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
