Hi, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. [...] >> + ocamlfind ocamldep -pp 'cpp -DARCH_SIXTYFOUR' -package unix -package >> bigarray -modules lib/unsafe_read_c.mli > lib/unsafe_read_c.mli.depends >> Command exited with code 2. >> E: Command '/usr/bin/ocamlbuild syntax/pa_bin_prot.cma >> syntax/pa_bin_prot.cmxa syntax/pa_bin_prot.a lib/libbin_prot.a >> lib/dllbin_prot.so lib/bin_prot.cma lib/bin_prot.cmxa lib/bin_prot.a >> lib_test/test_runner.native -tag debug' terminated with error code 10 Thanks again for all your work in tracking these down! I assume bin-prot/sid and sexplib310 build correctly again against dash 0.5.7-2. So what should be done with these bugs? I am tempted to say: - lower severity to important, since we have a workaround - reassign to current ocaml-nox - merge and mark as forwarded to http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5371 Does that sound reasonable? Jonathan who is looking forward to having a few fewer RC bugs on his radar :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111016110442.ga22...@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net
